SAP Disaster Recovery: Techniques and Best Practices

Reading Time: < 1 minute

In this Enterprise Times article, Harry Aujla, partner alliance director at SIOS, examines why disaster recovery (DR) deserves as much strategic attention as high availability (HA) in protecting SAP environments and ensuring business continuity. He clarifies the differences between HA and DR, emphasizing that while HA aims to keep systems running during localized failures, DR focuses on restoring operations after major incidents such as cyberattacks or natural disasters. 

The article outlines the business, financial, and regulatory risks of underinvesting in DR, then guides readers through two core recovery models, sitewide recovery and application-level recovery, highlighting the benefits, trade-offs, and cost considerations of each. Aujla concludes that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to SAP disaster recovery, urging organizations to align their strategy with business priorities, service-level requirements, and tolerance for downtime to build a resilient and practical recovery plan.


Recent Posts

High Availability and Disaster Recovery Everywhere: From General Concepts to Generating Solutions

Related Blogs / Background Reading Recommendations Within this blog, there is also the assumed familiarity with the LifeKeeper Resource Hierarchy framework and LifeKeeper […]

Read More
Solution for Linux

Taking Over a SIOS LifeKeeper for Linux Cluster

Imagine you’re standing outside of your minivan, baby in hand, reaching for the baby’s diaper bag when a large black van with a […]

Read More

Eliminating Single Points of Failure

In the world of enterprise IT, the phrase “Single Point of Failure” (SPOF) is enough to keep any system administrator awake at night. […]

Read More