SAP Disaster Recovery: Techniques and Best Practices

Reading Time: < 1 minute

In this Enterprise Times article, Harry Aujla, partner alliance director at SIOS, examines why disaster recovery (DR) deserves as much strategic attention as high availability (HA) in protecting SAP environments and ensuring business continuity. He clarifies the differences between HA and DR, emphasizing that while HA aims to keep systems running during localized failures, DR focuses on restoring operations after major incidents such as cyberattacks or natural disasters. 

The article outlines the business, financial, and regulatory risks of underinvesting in DR, then guides readers through two core recovery models, sitewide recovery and application-level recovery, highlighting the benefits, trade-offs, and cost considerations of each. Aujla concludes that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to SAP disaster recovery, urging organizations to align their strategy with business priorities, service-level requirements, and tolerance for downtime to build a resilient and practical recovery plan.


Recent Posts

Why 99.99% Uptime Still Means Downtime

Why 99.99% Uptime Doesn’t Mean 100% Uptime

Have you ever looked closely at a container of hand sanitizer? “Kills 99.99% of germs” is usually presented prominently somewhere on the packaging. […]

Read More
CLI vs. GUI for High Availability Clusters

Understanding the Role of the CLI in Highly Available Environments

When people think about high availability (HA), the first thought is technologies such as clustering, automated failover, replication, and disaster recovery. These capabilities […]

Read More

High Availability for IT Resilience

Modern IT environments have never been more powerful, or more complicated. Organizations now run critical applications across hybrid clouds, distributed infrastructure, edge locations, […]

Read More