SAP Disaster Recovery: Techniques and Best Practices

Reading Time: < 1 minute

In this Enterprise Times article, Harry Aujla, partner alliance director at SIOS, examines why disaster recovery (DR) deserves as much strategic attention as high availability (HA) in protecting SAP environments and ensuring business continuity. He clarifies the differences between HA and DR, emphasizing that while HA aims to keep systems running during localized failures, DR focuses on restoring operations after major incidents such as cyberattacks or natural disasters. 

The article outlines the business, financial, and regulatory risks of underinvesting in DR, then guides readers through two core recovery models, sitewide recovery and application-level recovery, highlighting the benefits, trade-offs, and cost considerations of each. Aujla concludes that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to SAP disaster recovery, urging organizations to align their strategy with business priorities, service-level requirements, and tolerance for downtime to build a resilient and practical recovery plan.


Recent Posts

AI and Critical Applications

AI Is Moving Fast. Critical Applications Still Need to Stay Up.

AI is changing how companies serve customers, analyze information, and get work done. The opportunity is real, and organizations are right to explore […]

Read More
What is High Availability

What Is High Availability (HA)?

There are so many acronyms in the world today; sometimes it’s difficult to keep up with what they all mean, especially for everyday […]

Read More

Surviving the Friday Night Crash: From Scrappy Bare Metal to Seamless Data Replication 

It was my sophomore year of high school. It was late on a Friday night, and like most teenagers, I was zoned out […]

Read More