Service Level Agreements and the Four Nines are Not Enough for High Availability in the Cloud

Reading Time: 2 minutes

When most people think of high availability, they set four nines (99.99%) or less than five minutes of downtime every month as the baseline. But according to Dave Bermingham, SIOS Director of Customer Success, in this TFiR video interview, high availability is more than that.

Dave argues that counting on nines is really a measurement that you might be judged against, but really trying to guarantee a level of nines is almost impossible. Because there’s so many points in that availability chain that can be a single point of failure. Four nines is certainly a great number to be judged against and to strive for, but overall it doesn’t mean a lot to have just four nines for my database server.

Effective High Availability Covers a Complex Availability Chain

Even with Cloud SLAs (Service Level Agreements), one can’t be fully rest assured as most cloud providers offer four nines on compute, which is only one part of the availability chain (along with network, storage, and the hops between). Bermingham warns, “There’s a million points of failure. So, trying to think that my cloud provider offers four nines so I’m covered, you’re kind of fooling yourself there. You have to look at the big picture and do what you can to identify those points of failures, to minimize the potential points of failure and to have a recovery plan, should something happen.”

When considering High Availability/Disaster Recovery (HA/DR), Bermingham believes the thing that causes the most visible downtime is human error. Bermingham also suggests that authorization and access to the system should also be restricted to reduce the point of failure. “You should only give access to those who absolutely need access to it and you should also ensure that they are highly trained and that you have all the things in place to help minimize potential oops.”

SIOS offers a single solution to meet both high availability and disaster recovery needs across a wide variety of operating systems (Windows, Linux), platforms, and applications, including SAP, SAP HANA, MaxDB, SQL Server, Oracle, and other environments running in SAN-based, shared storage configurations or SANless, local data storage configurations. Contact us for more information.


Recent Posts

Where should HA live?

Where Should HA “Live”? Matching Placement to Your Availability Targets

At a recent trade show, one question came up repeatedly: Where does SIOS LifeKeeper actually run? The answer is important. LifeKeeper is installed […]

Read More
Why 99.99% Uptime Still Means Downtime

Why 99.99% Uptime Doesn’t Mean 100% Uptime

Have you ever looked closely at a container of hand sanitizer? “Kills 99.99% of germs” is usually presented prominently somewhere on the packaging. […]

Read More
CLI vs. GUI for High Availability Clusters

Understanding the Role of the CLI in Highly Available Environments

When people think about high availability (HA), the first thought is technologies such as clustering, automated failover, replication, and disaster recovery. These capabilities […]

Read More